<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matter and Anti-Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drunkandretired.com/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/</link>
	<description>Est. 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/wordpress/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;deleted-comment&quot;&gt;This post has been removed by a blog administrator.&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="deleted-comment">This post has been removed by a blog administrator.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cote'</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cote']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/wordpress/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just removed the above comment &#039;cause it was a duplicate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just removed the above comment &#8217;cause it was a duplicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/wordpress/2004/07/27/matter-and-anti-matter/#comment-1630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have liked Surowiecki&#039;s New Yorker column (&quot;The Financial Page&quot;), although his style has become wooden in the past 3 years or so that he&#039;s been writing it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Formula:  Start with historical anecdote, preferably drawing on the early Industrial era.  Then, segue (via drawn parallels) into a commentary on a current event appearing on the front page of the Times business section.  Generalize into a thesis which is then tested with selective present-day anecdotes across business disciplines.  Finally, suggest how economic policy and business behavior should adjust to embrace Surowiecki&#039;s thesis as an action-item &quot;takeaway.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This formula gets his points across alright, but I wonder if any of you other readers out there are getting a bit chafed by his near-singsong plugin prose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;d be curious to hear how well this book reads, specifically if Surowiecki manages to mix up his style enough here to avoid monotony across all 300-odd pages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regarding the matter-antimatter concern, you could always have Amazon split up the order into two separate shipments.  Or at least have them sandwich a copy of Fathers and Sons between the two titles.  With all that Russian nihlism in close proximity, the two books would shrug the other off and go &quot;ehhh...&quot;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just watch out for spilt vodka; it tends to dissolve offset ink.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have liked Surowiecki&#8217;s New Yorker column (&#8220;The Financial Page&#8221;), although his style has become wooden in the past 3 years or so that he&#8217;s been writing it.</p>
<p>Formula:  Start with historical anecdote, preferably drawing on the early Industrial era.  Then, segue (via drawn parallels) into a commentary on a current event appearing on the front page of the Times business section.  Generalize into a thesis which is then tested with selective present-day anecdotes across business disciplines.  Finally, suggest how economic policy and business behavior should adjust to embrace Surowiecki&#8217;s thesis as an action-item &#8220;takeaway.&#8221;</p>
<p>This formula gets his points across alright, but I wonder if any of you other readers out there are getting a bit chafed by his near-singsong plugin prose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to hear how well this book reads, specifically if Surowiecki manages to mix up his style enough here to avoid monotony across all 300-odd pages.</p>
<p>Regarding the matter-antimatter concern, you could always have Amazon split up the order into two separate shipments.  Or at least have them sandwich a copy of Fathers and Sons between the two titles.  With all that Russian nihlism in close proximity, the two books would shrug the other off and go &#8220;ehhh&#8230;&#8221;  </p>
<p>Just watch out for spilt vodka; it tends to dissolve offset ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

