<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Google Enterprise Apps On the Way; Search Behind the Firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drunkandretired.com/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/</link>
	<description>Est. 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Is Enterprise Search an Application or a Feature?</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[People Over Process &#187; Is Enterprise Search an Application or a Feature?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/wordpress/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/#comment-1963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] had a long history with trying to figure out enterprise search. The obvious, easy win that any Google mini (or whatever) will take care of is just fixing your [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had a long history with trying to figure out enterprise search. The obvious, easy win that any Google mini (or whatever) will take care of is just fixing your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; You Say &#8220;Potato,&#8221; I say &#8220;competing&#8221;: Microsoft and Google (with Postini bonus!)</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[People Over Process &#187; You Say &#8220;Potato,&#8221; I say &#8220;competing&#8221;: Microsoft and Google (with Postini bonus!)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/wordpress/2005/06/08/more-google-enterprise-apps-on-the-way-search-behind-the-firewall/#comment-1962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For example, I can&#8217;t be looking at ads and clicking them (making money for Google) when I&#8217;m hanging out in SharePoint. Now, Google could &#8220;fix&#8221; that by expanding the install base of things like the search appliance, Google Desktop, and acquiring hybrid intra/internet applications like SpiceWorks. I was an early fan of the search appliance, but corporate search has always been a weird thing. It tends to get crudded up in the RFP tub wherein you end up with something that does everything the search committee wanted, but no one wants to use it. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, I can&#8217;t be looking at ads and clicking them (making money for Google) when I&#8217;m hanging out in SharePoint. Now, Google could &#8220;fix&#8221; that by expanding the install base of things like the search appliance, Google Desktop, and acquiring hybrid intra/internet applications like SpiceWorks. I was an early fan of the search appliance, but corporate search has always been a weird thing. It tends to get crudded up in the RFP tub wherein you end up with something that does everything the search committee wanted, but no one wants to use it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

