<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the Customers Say &quot;So What?&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drunkandretired.com/2006/01/31/when-the-customers-say-so-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2006/01/31/when-the-customers-say-so-what/</link>
	<description>Est. 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cote'</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2006/01/31/when-the-customers-say-so-what/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cote']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/?p=2598#comment-2292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember that Greenspun interview (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail94.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, right?). My feel on the open source biz model is that there&#039;s certainly money to be made in it, but perhaps not &lt;i&gt;enough&lt;/i&gt; money when compared to commercial software. At least, that&#039;s the perception I feel that most folks have. I&#039;ll have to look into that theory some more and post about it over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drunkandretired.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the new blog&lt;/a&gt;.

I hear you about the refactoring. I&#039;ve always tried to kick up the idea of &quot;boutique programming&quot; (a rephrasing of &quot;one-off programming&quot;): if the costs of programming and support of the code get low enough, maybe it could be a reality. Then you&#039;d just hire a programmer to change the tabs for you. Of course, the platform would need to support that. The real, long-term question is will this make customers (a.) happier with this software, and, (b.) buy more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember that Greenspun interview (<a href="http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail94.html" rel="nofollow">this one</a>, right?). My feel on the open source biz model is that there&#8217;s certainly money to be made in it, but perhaps not <i>enough</i> money when compared to commercial software. At least, that&#8217;s the perception I feel that most folks have. I&#8217;ll have to look into that theory some more and post about it over at <a href="http://www.drunkandretired.com" rel="nofollow">the new blog</a>.</p>
<p>I hear you about the refactoring. I&#8217;ve always tried to kick up the idea of &#8220;boutique programming&#8221; (a rephrasing of &#8220;one-off programming&#8221;): if the costs of programming and support of the code get low enough, maybe it could be a reality. Then you&#8217;d just hire a programmer to change the tabs for you. Of course, the platform would need to support that. The real, long-term question is will this make customers (a.) happier with this software, and, (b.) buy more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chui</title>
		<link>http://drunkandretired.com/2006/01/31/when-the-customers-say-so-what/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drunkandretired.com/?p=2598#comment-2293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/02/saas_lessons_le.shtm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Software as a Service - Lessons Learned&lt;/a&gt; over a Windley.com. http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/02/saas_lessons_le.shtm

Phil Greenspun&#039;s interview on IT Conversation was illuminating. He argues that open source companies who had control of the source code can make good profit because companies offer a lot of money to get their patches into the main code base.

Salesforce.com, being a hosted service, could support customization, but it is somewhat harder. For one thing, it&#039;ll mean providing development servers for the customers. In addition, there is probably a tonne of refactoring just to let clients customize their tabs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/02/saas_lessons_le.shtm" rel="nofollow">Software as a Service &#8211; Lessons Learned</a> over a Windley.com. <a href="http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/02/saas_lessons_le.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/02/saas_lessons_le.shtm</a></p>
<p>Phil Greenspun&#8217;s interview on IT Conversation was illuminating. He argues that open source companies who had control of the source code can make good profit because companies offer a lot of money to get their patches into the main code base.</p>
<p>Salesforce.com, being a hosted service, could support customization, but it is somewhat harder. For one thing, it&#8217;ll mean providing development servers for the customers. In addition, there is probably a tonne of refactoring just to let clients customize their tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

